film
The amount of times
Ive been positively surprised by a film,
is very scarcely indeed,
I remember how I was looking forward to see
"Kill Bill", and I also remember how immensly
disappointed I was by it, 9 of 10 films
lately have all been very crappy,
so I had no expectations on the
"Da Vinci Code" , and yes the
first 15 minutes it wasnt anything special,
but then it started growing,
I cant put my finger on it but I really
enjoyed the whole film, ok so it had a rather
silly twist halfway in it (whos on whos side?)
but I found it interesting,
WHY is it that Jesus must have been
an unmarried virgin when he died?
I dont think he was that, I mean a 33yearold
virgin nailed on that cross wouldnt have said
"Oh father forgive them because they dont knoweth
what they are doing", a 33yearold virgin would more likely
have said, or shouted, "noooooooo no fair, this sucks,
I havent ever tasted the fruit!!" or something similar ..
Joke aside, its an interesting, but, as far as I can google,
a highly unlikely case, most experts dismiss the authors
"suspicions" and deem them ridicolous and sacrilege,
but as Tom said (anyone else noticed how Tom Hanks
is a dead ringer for Steven Seagal?? Ssame hairdo, same
doublechin, its uncanning) in the film,
he may have been the son of God but he was also a MAN
2 Comments:
Da Vinci koden är faktiskt bättre än vad jag trodde den skulle vara. Dock är boken (oftast är det ju så) bättre.
Den hava jag icke läst, kanske, om jag hittar den på nån 19:90-rea skola inhandla :)
Post a Comment
<< Home